The Strange Place of Religion in Contemporary Art Commentary
See a Problem?
Thanks for telling united states about the problem.
Friend Reviews
Reader Q&A
Be the first to inquire a question about On the Strange Place of Religion in Gimmicky Art
Community Reviews
He relates the WHOLE history of religious art in one chapter, stating in vague terms that "something changed during the Renaissance" and affirming that past the 20th century "organized religion had sunk out of sight." (Even though many avant-gardes were securely religious, such as the Blaue Reiter, de Stijl, Russian constructivism, Abstract Expressionis
I was quite disappointed by this book. The author sadly does not challenge our assumptions about the traditional divide between organized religion and contemporary art.He relates the WHOLE history of religious fine art in one affiliate, stating in vague terms that "something changed during the Renaissance" and affirming that past the 20th century "religion had sunk out of sight." (Fifty-fifty though many avant-gardes were securely religious, such every bit the Blaue Reiter, de Stijl, Russian constructivism, Abstract Expressionism, etc.).
While citing mod artists who dealt with religious christian motifs, such as Emil Nolde, Dali, Rouault, Chagall, and Francis Bacon, the author dismisses these examples as not being truly religious, since Nolde was "in a state of ecstatic trance" at the time (p. 13), Dali was simply applying his "paranoiac-critical" surrealist method (p. 14), and equally for Bacon, his painting is "gruesome" and is "hardly the kind of religious image that could be placed in a church building." Therefore, these artworks are apparently not taken into consideration.
"When organized religion does come upward in the art globe, it is because at that place has been a scandal: someone has painted a Madonna using elephant dung, or put a statuette of Jesus into a jar of urine." While he does take a betoken, this does non prove that serious religious art isn't being created, it only doesn't receive every bit much attention as the "scandalous" work, PRECISELY because serious work isn't interesting for reporters.
Also, Elkins affirms that "fine art" is the source of all other forms of art, which also deserves to be questioned. Or not, manifestly: "If y'all notice yourself at variance with these definitions or the assumptions that atomic number 82 me to them, then this book may pose a trouble that isn't a problem for y'all. In which case I would only say that your sense of fine art might take been compromised (simplified, reduced) by the need to imagine that information technology is different from and equal to other kinds of fine art-making." So apparently I was just wrong, sorry!
Religious art is oftentimes bad and "kitsch" and simply has "no place" in the art world. "Modernism is merely like that." (But WHY though?) The style he disses his ain Korean fine art educatee is pretty hilarious- because her English isn't and so skilful he assumes she isn't able to follow his classes and he concludes to himself that she could probably produce religious commercial posters or something merely definitely not "fine art." I can't tell to what degree he's beingness serious or if it's meant to be ironic then I won't insist on that one.
That being said, if you want to read this book go ahead, it'southward far from a waste matter of time and quite entertaining, I just had a few problems with it.
...moreIf you lot are interested in the human relationship of art and faith, or if you lot brand art and your work takes organized religion equally its subject field affair or influence in any fashion, shape, or form, I recommend reading this volume. It may be mildly infuriating at times (depending on your position on Fine art World definitions of art), merely so over again it is ever good to know what the opponent's argument may exist.
Bottom line: B+. A quick read about postmodern art and religion with lots of loose ends to follow to one'south own decision(s).
...moreThe book offers a scattering of scenerios of how fine artists, including art students, have treated religion in their works from the i
Artists who are also religiously minded live in two, ofttimes competing, worlds. The fine art globe does not empathise nor trust religion (run across Postmodern Heretics). Religious communities do not trust nor empathise the art globe (meet State of the Arts: From Bezalel to Mapplethorpe). James Elkins has now done justice to both worlds with intellectual curiously and respect.The book offers a handful of scenerios of how fine artists, including fine art students, take treated religion in their works from the ironic and condemning to the naive and sentimental. As well addressed is the full general art communities posture towards the subject field, which is often hostile or at least critically skeptical. This is the finest book on faith and the arts I take read, which is many. I recommend information technology.
...moreNews & Interviews
Welcome dorsum. Simply a moment while we sign you lot in to your Goodreads account.
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1121266.On_the_Strange_Place_of_Religion_in_Contemporary_Art
0 Response to "The Strange Place of Religion in Contemporary Art Commentary"
Post a Comment